> Everyone here does realise that we're getting dangerously close to the old > "dynamic vs static typing" religious war, right?
Yes but there's no reason to get religious about it, "static when you can, dynamic when you must" goes a long way. > Regardless of your perspective on that debate; I think it's fair to say that > an organisation who's primary business role is to pump around serious > amounts of money would be interested in the added safety and verification > that a static type system offers, and really wouldn't look kindly on any > attempts to subvert that extra security. Here's where I stop to wonder... what kind of nasty source code littered with BigDecimal and associated formatting/rounding logic, can you find in a place like that? It scared me to think about. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
