The fact that people are finally seeing that ruby isn`t the best option to Perl. And, Perl has come a long way in improving it`s oo support with moose etc... I think people are moving away from ruby and to better scripting languages i.e. Python, Perl and other languages.
From: [email protected] Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 21:56:40 +0100 Subject: Re: [The Java Posse] Re: NetBeans kills support for Ruby on Rails To: [email protected] What a coincidence... Jetbrains proposed RubyMine today also. ! :-) http://www.jetbrains.com/ruby/ On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 21:46, Vince O'Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote: "we are unable to justify the continued allocation of resources" It's a perfectly reasonable reason for the the move. However, given that NetBeans is given away for free (as in free beer) the question has to be asked: What, exactly, does justify the allocation of resources? How, for instance, is the allocation of NetBeans resources to Java justified? What are the criteria that failed to be met by Ruby? Vince. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
