sweet! a political debate :) Yes, having lots of money makes life easier. I think that applies world wide.
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 1:03 AM, Casper Bang <[email protected]> wrote: > > A negative ad doesn't fall under trademark law because while customers > may > > be getting hoodwinked, the ad does not try to fake out brand names. > > Nope but it becomes subject to other laws, in Europe anyway. > > It's something I have never understood about the way capitalism is > implemented in the US. If you have money: > ...you can get out on bail. > ...you can get treated for your illness. > ...you can hire attorneys and win most any case. > ...you can win on smearing your opponent rather than actually > marketing yourself. > > I digress, but it does suggest why there's also a difference in patent > litigation (which is what this case started being about). > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
