I was going to suggest that Ben try out Easy Mock as well. I have been reasonably happy using it. If Mockito is an evolution of EasyMock, with stuff that makes it better/easier to use, then perhaps it is the way to go.
-- Regards Parag On Mar 4, 6:51 am, Noctiluque <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 For Mockito. (I've used JMock and EasyMock too). Mockito is an > evolution of EasyMock. Its small but critical differences just make > it quicker to write tests IMO. > > > (The rest of the > > application is a 10-year-old ball-of-mud > > If you want to test a legacy "ball of mud" the PowerMock+Mockito > combination is awesome. (PowerMock sits atop EasyMock or Mockito. ) > PowerMock allows you to mock concrete *final* classes, *final* methods > and *static* methods using. And it actually worked in the extreme > cases I wanted to use it in. Highly recommended. > > The excellent H2 in memory database can be useful for a pretty fast > way of stubbing a database rather than trying to mock jdbc calls but > YMMMV. (Although lots of people recommend mocking your DAOs, your ball > of mud may not have them). > > Good luck -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
