Given one of our frequently recurring themes of what defines a language: syntax 
vs functionality, I found it amusing having come across this essay by a 
mathematician, called Pi is Wrong (http://www.math.utah.edu/~palais/pi.html), 
where Bob Palais argues in favor of changing the value of π.

I don't think Palais seriously expects all of the world's scientists, teachers, 
and curricula to switch over to the new π.  Rather, it's more of an 
illustration 
of how he feels mathematics got some of its syntax wrong, resulting in so much 
legacy on top of it.  It is so deeply ingrained in our minds that it will 
likely 
continue to cause some undue consternation 'til the end of the human race as we 
know it.  It's not so much a real limitation of expressiveness, but a certain 
clumsiness of notation.  Sound familiar?

 Alexey


      

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.

Reply via email to