On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Alexey Zinger <[email protected]>wrote:
> Use of exceptions is not usually something people rave about either way. > Error handling is like doing dishes -- necessary, but hardly glamorous. > Right now, people marvel at collections API, clever use of generics, > annotations, whatever. But exceptions? People only complain about them, > when they're inconveniently designed or just say nothing. I'm reluctant to > say that any framework with checked exceptions in it, where people don't say > anything about its exception API is a silent form of praise, but that's as > good an answer as I can come up with off the cuff. > Interesting observation. Indeed, when exceptions are well designed in a framework, you just don't think about them. It's a bit like system administrators: when they are doing a great job, you forget they even exist. Spring is famous for having gone 100% runtime exceptions, and the least we can say is that Spring users are not exactly quiet about Spring's exception handling... -- Cédric -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
