On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Casper Bang <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Having done a bit of C# development where exceptions are not checked > > there were some times when I missed them. > > The full story is that the designers of C# were not convinced that > they were worth the trouble. Actually, no. The full story is that .net could not support checked exceptions for backward compatibility reasons. Anything else you hear is post rationalization. By the way, this is the very same reason why C++ couldn't have checked exceptions either. -- Cédric -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
