On 28/03/2011 12:19 a.m., Neil Swingler wrote:
Let's assume for the sake of argument that the pro checked exception
camp cannot convince the other side and vice versa. Let us also assume
that both groups are large enough that their views cannot be dismissed
by the other. The debate has gone on for 8 years or more so I cannot
see anybody changing their minds now.
Let's imagine that checked exceptions have been removed from the
language:
The pro checked exception camp can write exactly the same code as now.
You seem to miss the point. It is the code that I cannot write due to
checked exceptions, which makes me pro checked exceptions.
Bruce
The contra checked exception camp could write less code to achieve the
same effect as they do now. That must surely be a good thing.
I propose therefore that the positives of removing checked exceptions
would outweigh the negatives
- Neil
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java
Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
