On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 6:38 AM, Casper Bang <[email protected]> wrote:
> I struggle to see the pro-checked-exception people's argument against > such a step towards greater leniency, not a single unit-test would > fail > You seem to be seeing "Not a single unit test would fail" as a good thing in the same way people who remove error checks suddenly marvel at how simple their code has become. Not a single unit test would fail if you suddenly decided to stop enforcing static typing in the compiler, but the end result would be a considerably weakened language. -- Cédric -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
