On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Kirk <[email protected]> wrote:
> Rewrite of history. MS wrote Windows specific extensions that would have > bound Java to Windows. I don't see that happening in this case. > Sure, but what I objected to back then was that Sun was mixing technical and legal concerns. >From a legal standpoint, Microsoft was clearly in breach of contract and deserved what happened to them. I just wish that Sun has shown a little more of nuance in their technical assessment of these new features, but they clearly did not and they produced the embarrassing link above. No doubt that Mc Nealy and his anti-Microsoft crusade is 100% to blame for this position, which confirmed the fact that Sun was definitely not a software company. -- Cédric -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
