On May 28, 2011 1:39 AM, "Alexey Zinger" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Isn't that why we have doclets?  Personally, I rarely find current
standard doclets lacking.
>

Not really, I'm thinking more along the lines of:

- JavaScript-based searching
- full CSS layout
- Redesigned look and feel
- In-place expansion of a method definition when clicking on it to see more
detail
- All of the above by default, not just a latent possibility for
customising, repeatedly, for each and every project
- Something that might plausibly have been designed within the last decade
- etc.

> Alexey
> 2001 Honda CBR600F4i (CCS)
> 1998 Honda RS125 (CCS)
> 2002 Suzuki Bandit 1200S
> http://weatherblackjack.appspot.com
> http://azinger.blogspot.com
> http://bsheet.sourceforge.net
> http://wcollage.sourceforge.net
>
> ________________________________
> From: Kevin Wright <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 8:29 PM
> Subject: [The Java Posse] JavaDoc due for an overhaul
>
> Looking over the new JavaFX 2.0 API, I couldn't help but notice how dated
the JavaDoc format now looks.
>
> We started here: http://docstore.mik.ua/jdk/api/packages.html
> and advanced to: http://download.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/
>
> Then it all stopped, until...
> we went from this:
http://img.surfpack.com/img/thumbs/j/java.sun.com_favicon.jpg
> to this: http://img.pho.to/img/thumbs/l/landingpad.oracle.com_favicon.jpg
>
>
> Did innovation really stop at framesets?
> Is a new favicon really the only change we can expect to JavaDoc?
>
> There's so much potential here for a revised design, some search
capabilities, a spot of script even!
> Am I alone in thinking this?
>
>
>
> --
> Kevin Wright
>
> gtalk / msn : [email protected]
> mail: [email protected]
> vibe / skype: kev.lee.wright
> quora: http://www.quora.com/Kevin-Wright
> twitter: @thecoda
>
> "My point today is that, if we wish to count lines of code, we should not
regard them as "lines produced" but as "lines spent": the current
conventional wisdom is so foolish as to book that count on the wrong side of
the ledger" ~ Dijkstra
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"The Java Posse" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"The Java Posse" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.

Reply via email to