What would also help - I think - is to make the ScalaDoc looking less ... frightening. :-)
Although I think the current ScalaDoc makes it much easier than before, it's easy to get lost in there. Recently I tried to find name of the function in Map to execute a function for each entry and get the collection of the results. In the end I used Google search to find this is the "map" function. On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 10:50, Jan Goyvaerts <[email protected]> wrote: > Sure - but the problem of introducing Scala is keep it at first as much as > possible like Java. > > I don't need to be convinced any more. It's the others ! :-) > > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 10:48, Kevin Wright <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> is it possible to modify an existing pom.xml file so it can compile and >>>> run both Java and Scala code ? >>>> >>> >>> It sure is! >>> >>> http://scala-tools.org/mvnsites/maven-scala-plugin/example_java.html >>> >>> >> >> Interestingly, this is something I've done even on pure Java projects, so >> that I can use the REPL for exploratory coding. I also much prefer the >> BDD-oriented DSLs available in ScalaTest and Specs over JUnit or TestNG >> (again, even when the non-test code is all pure Java). Both frameworks can >> also expose their tests via JUnit interfaces, to surefire integration isn't >> a problem here. >> >> It's also possible to manage a Java project with SBT, which still gives >> you some of the nice continuous compilation/testing/deployment behaviour, as >> well as the REPL. >> >> -- >> Kevin Wright >> >> gtalk / msn : [email protected] >> <[email protected]>mail: [email protected] >> vibe / skype: kev.lee.wright >> quora: http://www.quora.com/Kevin-Wright >> twitter: @thecoda >> >> "My point today is that, if we wish to count lines of code, we should not >> regard them as "lines produced" but as "lines spent": the current >> conventional wisdom is so foolish as to book that count on the wrong side of >> the ledger" ~ Dijkstra >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "The Java Posse" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
