For sure. And that is an advantage not to be sneezed at! On Jun 7, 2011 10:00 AM, "Ricky Clarkson" <[email protected]> wrote: > Its main advantage over some static checking is that it works right now. > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Jonathan Fuerth <[email protected]> wrote: >> EDT<T> wrapper is another good idea, but still delays the discovery of tread >> correctness bugs until runtime. A big advantage it does have is the >> unignorable "something here I have to pay attention to" flag for maintenance >> coders. >> >> I still feel like static analysis for GUI thread confinement should be >> possible. But of course my spare time project bandwidth is maxed out. >> >> -Jonathan >> >> On Jun 7, 2011 8:42 AM, "Ricky Clarkson" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "The Java Posse" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
