Hi Steve, It always is but then we find that we hit a scalability wall. I wouldn't go for a complex solution as that would be a premature optimization. However, I don't believe that many of the mutable solutions are really that extraordinarily complex. Especially when you have the smart guys sorting out the complexities for you.
Regards, Kirk On Jun 21, 2011, at 4:40 AM, Steve Lindsay wrote: > On Jun 21, 3:01 am, Kirk <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Again, I'm not against immutability, it just seems that we've all picked up >> on that sound bite and have forgotten all of the other colors that make the >> world interesting. >> > > Hasn't most of the immutability push (outside of this thread at least) > been about safety, maintainability, ability to reason about complexity > etc., rather than performance? > > - Steve > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
