On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Reinier Zwitserloot <[email protected]>wrote:
> I'd strongly suggest you go the traditional approach ('form submit style'),
> as it's easy, and it fits the internet. As in, the URLs make sense, your
> pages are indexable, and it all works (crappily, but it works, and it works
> with screenreaders for the blind, phone browsers, etc, etc) anywhere, even
> without javascript. The GWT/GMail model makes sense mostly for GMail-type
> apps (single URL where you do it all), not for your standard webpage or even
> webapp.
>
> Then throw in as much jQuery as you can to move the User Interaction parts
> of your site from 'pure crud, are we in the 90s still?' to shiny, usable,
> no-frustration goodness.
>
> As a side-benefit to all this the server-side code becomes relatively
> simple too.
>
> I have no idea which of lift and/or play fit the bill to do this, but gun
> to my head I vaguely recall Play is much more based around this kind of
> model than lift is.
>
By far. It seems to me Lift has been slowly losing momentum these past few
months and I've heard nothing but good things about Play, from Java and
Scala programmers alike. It's definitely the web framework I would pick
today.
--
Cédric
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
