+1 on using and waiting if you can. I benched the current build with some of the Akka guys and whie performance was stellar, they were concerned about a few things. The benching confirmed some issues that they were looking at and we discussed solutions that should make it even better. And, Akka plays beautifully with Java as well.
Regards, Kirk On 2012-01-03, at 12:47 PM, Kevin Wright wrote: > What version of Akka are you evaluating, and what's your time to market? > > If it's far enough away, your best bet is to look at the M2 release of Akka > 2.0. In particular, the Event Bus: > > http://akka.io/docs/akka/2.0-M2/java/event-bus.html > > I wish I could tell you a final release date, but we're at milestones already > and I know the guys are working flat out in the thing. I'd also be very > surprised if it wasn't done and dusted by April at the absolute latest; in > time for ScalaDays 2012. > > > On 3 January 2012 11:37, Fabrizio Giudici <[email protected]> > wrote: > Dear all, > > I'm making an evaluation for picking an actor platform that I could possibly > use later this year. So I've started doing some experimentation. My desire > was to end with a single platform, Akka, for it appears to be the most > performing one. I have two possible scenarios: the former is to use actors as > an evolution of message-passing architectures I'm already using inside simple > applications, where the choice is oriented to simplifying concurrency code > rather than having big number of actors to scale with; the latter, instead, > is possibly a distributed scenario (grid-oriented) where performance and > scalability are important. > > I hoped that Akka would fit both purposes, but so far it seems to fall short > for scenario #1: in fact, as far as I understand, it doesn't support publish > & subscribe which is my favourite pattern. Can you confirm? Is it possible to > achieve it by means of some extension or is it in the future milestones? > > So, for scenario #1, I'm evaluating Jetlang. It seems fine, I'd just to know > whether some of you have some experience with it. > > thanks. > > -- > Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager > Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere." > [email protected] > http://tidalwave.it - http://fabriziogiudici.it > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > > > > > -- > Kevin Wright > mail: [email protected] > gtalk / msn : [email protected] > quora: http://www.quora.com/Kevin-Wright > google+: http://gplus.to/thecoda > twitter: @thecoda > vibe / skype: kev.lee.wright > steam: kev_lee_wright > > "My point today is that, if we wish to count lines of code, we should not > regard them as "lines produced" but as "lines spent": the current > conventional wisdom is so foolish as to book that count on the wrong side of > the ledger" ~ Dijkstra > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
