Why limit yourself to just the two? I've experienced code that could justify every single one of those annotations...
On 4 January 2012 16:09, Eric Jablow <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Jan 3, 12:21 pm, "Fabrizio Giudici" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:50:59 +0100, Kevin Wright > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > And a swanky @Beta annotation too, it would seem. I must steal that > one > > > for my own nefarious purposes. > > Is there any way that the Google Annotation Gallery could be added to > a Maven > repository? I know it was an April Fool's joke, but having @WTF and > @RTFM > might be useful at certain cruel workplaces. > > Respectfully, > Eric Jablow > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > > -- Kevin Wright mail: [email protected] gtalk / msn : [email protected] quora: http://www.quora.com/Kevin-Wright google+: http://gplus.to/thecoda <[email protected]> twitter: @thecoda vibe / skype: kev.lee.wright steam: kev_lee_wright "My point today is that, if we wish to count lines of code, we should not regard them as "lines produced" but as "lines spent": the current conventional wisdom is so foolish as to book that count on the wrong side of the ledger" ~ Dijkstra -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
