ok, so lets say its a lottery application.

That means in the run up to the big draw on Saturday night its likely
to get insanely busy!

I can't see a way around not needing transactions but if there is a
way, please elaborate.

R

On 6 January 2012 14:19, Kirk Pepperdine <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think all the points are good.. they just lack context.. and so not all of
> them are going to fit..
>
> Kirk
>
> On 2012-01-06, at 3:18 PM, Robert Casto wrote:
>
> All these technology ideas are great but what is the task that all these
> people will be doing in such a short time frame?
>
> Can you avoid some work during this time period? Batch it up for later, put
> it in a queue, or have a process come by later and do cleanup when the
> systems are less busy. Do as little as possible while accomplishing just
> what is needed during this time. Doing less means you can get more done in
> the same time period without having to add more machines or make drastic
> changes.
>
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Fabrizio Giudici
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 15:03:59 +0100, Kirk Pepperdine
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> All nice points.
>>>
>>> I would add.. avoid transactions like the plague.
>>> Single threaded will be easier to scale out.. (think http)
>>> +1 on keep things in memory.. in fact I've customers that no longer put
>>> disks in their machines.. which surprisingly increases reliability.. (which
>>> really shouldn't be surprising).
>>
>>
>> +1 on everything, including the last point, but you can have a hard time
>> to persuade customers acquainted to the database for decades. It's possible
>> to use a hybrid approach: for instance Coherence (but AFAIK other similar
>> products) has got a "write behind" mode in which you basically commit to
>> memory, and then an async task pushes stuff to the database. I'm trying to
>> persuade a customer to go that way, but I still see raised eyebrows. But
>> perhaps we'll be able to start some serious prototyping in the next months.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager
>> Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere."
>> [email protected]
>> http://tidalwave.it - http://fabriziogiudici.it
>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "The Java Posse" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Robert Casto
> www.robertcasto.com
> www.sellerstoolbox.com
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "The Java Posse" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "The Java Posse" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.

Reply via email to