polgot programming.. well who knows wft that is.... but I do see more people 
using more langauges on the JVM.

Kirk

On 2012-01-21, at 5:21 PM, Alex Turner wrote:

> I have rarely worked somewhere where enough folks on the team had overlap in 
> more than the core skill set.  Ancillary tools are always handy, but they end 
> up being just that.  They are mostly esoteric and limited in understanding to 
> the one person that created them.  This is a great pity, but it just seems 
> like that's the way it goes.
> 
> For every little script and subsystem in another language, it's yet another 
> build or script that has to be understood in order to use it for the rest of 
> a team, and ultimately they either never get used or simply just slow the 
> team down. This seems to go double the more 'brilliant' the polyglot is.  
> They'll create this amazing script, and it's so amazing that only a high 
> skill  programmer in whatever specific language could figure out how it 
> works.  Somehow this is a badge of honor to some, but it seems like it should 
> be a badge of shame when you create things no-one else can work with.
> 
> Also, the fewer the languages, the easier it becomes to be expert at them.
> 
> Alex
> 
> On Jan 21, 2012, at 5:31 AM, Moandji Ezana wrote:
> 
>> In 2006, when Neal Ford coined or popularised the term polyglot programming, 
>> it seemed to gain some popularity.
>> 
>> However, in the past few years, the trend seems to have gone towards using 
>> as few languages as possible.
>> 
>> In Java you could use GWT or Android on the client and Hibernate on the 
>> server and not see either JavaScript or SQL.
>> 
>> With Node.js, JavaScript becomes the common language. Fantom and Clojure 
>> (via ClojureScript) can also compile to JavaScript.
>> 
>> Was polyglottism ever a good way to build an application? Is this just a 
>> pendulum swing or rather the result of more powerful tools?
>> 
>> Moandji
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "The Java Posse" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "The Java Posse" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.

Reply via email to