All good points Cedric. So which framework meets these criteria? 2012/2/17 Cédric Beust ♔ <[email protected]>: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Kevin Wright <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> My only critique is that I prefer scalate's jade templating language over >> play's own templates. But there's a module available for that, so it's >> really not a very big complaint :) > > > This is another important aspect for a web framework, in my opinion: being > template technology neutral. > > There are many, many ways to generate content with templates. First the > back-end/front-end dichotomy. On the back-end, you have Freemarker, maybe > Velocity (kinda abandoned I think?), Scalatra and then the web frameworks' > own templating mechanisms. > > On the front-end, you have another embarrassing of riches, such as Mustache > or Handlebars. Going even further, you can reconfigure your CSS with > on-the-fly technologies such as Less, or generate them statically and > including them the normal way. > > And of course, the web framework must also be at least Javascript neutral > and ideally, offer some kind of integration with mainstream Javascript > technologies such as jQuery. > > -- > Cédric > >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
