Ditto.

Stopped writing C++ even longer ago and have no  desire to learn Obj-C. And
with Java I'm way more productive than I ever was back then. I know of a
number of very large websites that have been ported to Java. You get a lot
when you use the language. Good libraries and tools come to mind.

On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Fabrizio Giudici <
[email protected]> wrote:

> On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 22:13:53 +0200, phil swenson <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>  This guy claims:
>>
>> "Unfortunately, Java's designers didn't seem to value CPU time at all.
>> The language has a nasty reputation for sluggish interfaces, and its
>> execution speed drags well behind C++'s. Pointer aliasing or not we
>> are many generations of optimisers away from languages such as Java
>> overtaking C++ so if you need fast code C/C++ is the obvious choice."
>>
>> article here:
>> http://slidetocode.com/2012/**04/14/objective-c/<http://slidetocode.com/2012/04/14/objective-c/>
>>
>> discussion here:
>> http://news.ycombinator.com/**item?id=3840861<http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3840861>
>>
>>
>
> I posted another comment. For your reference, it's below.
>
>
>
>
> "Unfortunately, Java's designers didn't seem to value CPU time at all. "
>
> Well, it's obvious that people think of (Apple) fanboism when they read
> such misinformation; apart from the fact that there's no point in writing
> such statements without citing some numbers or real cases.
>
> I can tell you that I've written my last line of C++ exactly ten years
> ago. In these ten years I've designed and implemented a good deal of
> industrial software in different segments and never experienced performance
> problems. Already in 2004, which is ages ago, I designed and implemented a
> near real time system for distributing telemetry data in F1 racing - among
> others, Renault won two championships running that system. It was Java 1.4
> and it worked pretty well. The specs were pretty demanding. I recall people
> wondering whether Java was up to the requisites (at the time it was a
> reasonable doubt, not today).
>
> I am just lucky as I can mention a publicly known project, but there are
> tons of people around who daily experience excellent performance with Java
> and don't feel any desire to go back to C/C++. You'd just attend a couple
> of Java conferences (or at least read the slides) before publishing
> uninformed statements.
>
>
> --
> Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager
> Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere."
> [email protected]
> http://tidalwave.it - http://fabriziogiudici.it
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "The Java Posse" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscribe@**
> googlegroups.com <javaposse%[email protected]>.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**
> group/javaposse?hl=en <http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en>.
>
>


-- 
Robert Casto
www.robertcasto.com
www.sellerstoolbox.com
www.lakotaeastbands.org

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.

Reply via email to