I was a junior at the time and it was pushed upon me :( I didn't realise it was a smalltalk app though.
I do remember we had it setup with some source control (can't remember which or how) that did pessimistic locking at the method level, real pain. It also came bundled with its own version of Java (1.1!!!) that in our version couldn't be changed... Joe will love this but at time I preferred Borlands JBuilder, but work wouldn't go for it. The way we had Visual Age setup I think it was a case of all or nothing, no one on a dif IDE was allowed! How things have changed, hope Code Bubbles is better, not too hard though. Phil On Tuesday, 17 April 2012 12:28:50 UTC+1, Mark Derricutt wrote: > > On 17/04/12 10:52 PM, Phil Maskell wrote: > > Didn't Visual Age for Java by IBM hide the files from you and show all > > the methods? This sounds similar. > It did that by "virtue" of storing them inside the Smalltalk Image ( > remember - Visual Age for Java was a Smalltalk application! ) > > You could "export", or "file out" as the Smalltalk term was the files to > disk for submission to things like CVS tho ( getting things back IN from > CVS was a different matter tho.... An exercise best left for the > masochistic. > > Mark > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/javaposse/-/XrHbu1YynGYJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
