On Wed, 23 May 2012 22:53:14 +0200, Cédric Beust ♔ <[email protected]>
wrote:
Indeed. This part should be cause for mild concern, though:
The jury concluded that Google infringed on 37 copyrighted APIs but it
also
agreed that Google demonstrated that it was led to believe it did not
need
a license for using Java.
There still hasn't been a ruling as a matter of law about the
copyrightability of API's (in the US anyway), so that sword is still
dangling over our heads.
How longer will it take for have a final word?
--
Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager
Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere."
[email protected]
http://tidalwave.it - http://fabriziogiudici.it
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Java
Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
