On Monday, June 4, 2012 9:35:50 AM UTC+2, Ricky Clarkson wrote: > > Option isn't the same as the null object pattern, because null objects get > used as if they were real objects whereas code dealing with Options looks > different. It has to contain some form of check or lifting of a function. > I didn't say it was. I just added C# to Cédric's list of languages (Groovy, Fantom and Kotlin) which adopted an up-front way of dealing with null, rather than burying the concept as a NOP.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Java Posse" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/javaposse/-/3dzxeBvdtAEJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
