If you can poke it twice and see a different result the second time it's mutable.
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 3:46 AM, Russel Winder <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 15:57 -0300, Ricky Clarkson wrote: > > That can't happen with shared mutable objects. > > So don't have shared mutable objects. > > Actually is it possible to have a shared mutable object? Aren't objects > supposed to be self-contained state that respond to messages? > > -- > Russel. > > ============================================================================= > Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: > sip:[email protected] > 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected] > London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
