On 30 August 2012 12:28, Fabrizio Giudici <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 10:15:41 +0200, Kevin Wright <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Isn't that a bit like saying: "Well okay, snails may seem slow, but you >> only think that because you haven't seen the sloth yet!". >> > > Np, it isn't. My security is menaced by the slowness of Oracle as well as > of Apple and others, so things must be put in context. Furthermore, if > Oracle is the only one to be slow, one might think that it's their specific > faulty process. If > all manufacturers are slow, perhaps it's a inherent problem of technology > or such. > > I think you misunderstood. I was just claiming that Oracle can still be called slow, even if someone else is slower. All of our security is at risk and I firmly believe that it's because Oracle are sucking up to the investment banks with their firewalls and adversity to change, instead of considering the millions of non-bank Java users. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
