On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Simon Ochsenreither < [email protected]> wrote:
> “what's the most minimal thing to do to prevent the feature gap to the CLR > from getting even more embarrassing”. The CLR is hardly ever a consideration in Java directions. The main concerns are much more along the lines of offering as much added value while preserving backward compatibility, two objectives that are, sadly, very strongly at odds with each other. -- Cédric -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
