On Fri, 19 Oct 2012 22:30:26 +0200, Robert Casto <[email protected]>
wrote:
You turned it into a philosophical discussion which is kind of boring
now.
I was adding other uses of Java to your original post. Tried to help but
I
see your more interested in semantics.
Well, my first post of the thread was pretty dead on "nobody" vs
"somebody". Yes, it's about semantics.
I'm interested in other uses of Java too, of course. You don't have to
convince me that there are, and I think that the assertion is easy to
demonstrate. Ricky added more examples, and I'm working with desktop
industrial applications for years with big corporates. It's the end-user
segment that, I think, need to be clarified.
So, I figure that the US judiciary system has some requirements similar to
the one of auto-dealers you mentioned, or perhaps there's a technical
problem with HTML and signed uploads (it looks as it's the same strict
requirement for italian business consultants). Architecturally speaking,
and considering that upgrade problems aren't rare circumstances, I'd
probably prefer to see a webapp for that kind of software if I was in
charge of it. So, it might even be *bad* to have Java there, but it's
there. The presence of Java on the desktop is mostly underestimated, this
is my point.
--
Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect @ Tidalwave s.a.s.
"We make Java work. Everywhere."
http://tidalwave.it/fabrizio/blog - [email protected]
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Java
Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
