Sure, but that was not my point...

-- 
Cédric




On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Ricky Clarkson
<[email protected]>wrote:

> I have 'inflicted' Option on these people and not had any real problems.
>
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Cédric Beust ♔ <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:21 AM, clay <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Today, JVM programmers are  highly divided.
> >
> >
> > I'm not sure about that. Sure, if you read this mailing-list and you go
> to
> > conferences, it's very easy to get this impression because the community
> you
> > belong to is, by definition, made of seekers and curious professionals
> who
> > live on the bleeding edge of their profession. It's a text book example
> of
> > sample bias.
> >
> > Step outside of this community and ask random Java developers what they
> > think of JVM languages besides Java and most of them have hardly heard of
> > Scala, much less taken a look at it. I bet they will also think that
> Java is
> > a great language and much more fun to work in than C++ was, which is all
> > they care about (and honestly, I can't blame anyone with this line of
> > thought).
> >
> > --
> > Cédric
> >
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Java 
Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.

Reply via email to