On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Simon Ochsenreither < [email protected]> wrote:
> Sorry Christian, but I don't see any attack at all, especially not any > personal. > That's the main problem with your emails and overall attitude: people keep pointing out that you should tone down your passive aggressivity and ad hominem comments (including Martin himself, remember? That was not so long ago), and yet you continue to engage in aggressive advocacy. Personally, I probably couldn't care less about Java's Option > You seem to care a great deal considering your heavy involvement in the latest discussions on the topic here and in other places. , and I think it is pretty clear that there is more or less zero chance of > Oracle listening to feedback on that topic. > See, you have obviously not even tried to read what Brian said in the email I forwarded or even bothered reading the 100+ emails on the subject on lambda-dev. There has been a lot of discussion and a lot of listening. At the end, Oracle made a decision that you don't like. It's called a disagreement, not a "not listening". > I'm commenting because I have sympathy with Java's struggle to evolve and > watching it fail just hurts. > Your antagonism toward Java, Kotlin and Ceylon is well documented, I'm not sure why you keep pretending sympathy while your only goal is to promote Scala and deride people who choose not to use it. -- Cédric -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
