It was the missing apostrophe in "its" that gave you away :) Your *true* troll tends to make that mistake the other way round…
On 19 February 2013 17:39, Joseph Ottinger <[email protected]> wrote: > Ha! Why would I try to disguise who I am? Heck, I thought my post was > absurdly obvious from the very start, just like I thought your initial > point was absurdly obvious - I thought you were trying to troll the list, > so I was responding in kind. I was vastly amused when you responded, and > have remained amused. > > Heck, trying to disguise who I am would have made the whole affair > slightly malicious - not very malicious, because it was so very very very > obvious from the very start, but slightly malicious nonetheless. By using > my real name and identity (oh goodness me, you can haz google?) I figured > you were in on the joke at the very start. > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 12:03 PM, rakesh mailgroups < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Ok Joseph, joke over. >> >> I know who you are. I'm actually quite shocked that you would make no >> attempt to disguise your identity. You're all over StackOverflow as well >> putting your blog in your post. >> >> A Principle Engineer at RedHat. Do they know you are also trolling like >> this? If you applied for a job and I came across your posts, I would not >> give you a job. >> >> You should be ashamed of yourself. >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Joseph Ottinger >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Hey this is cool, I was looking at Spring in google and after i filtered >>> out all the weather stuff and all the car stuff i finded a whole lot of >>> stuff on sites like TheServerSide.com and InfoQ. Apparently spring is >>> pretty popular after all. >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:36 AM, rakesh mailgroups < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> its not a bad practice to parameterise a configuration file. How else >>>> would you do it? >>>> >>>> Your classes need environment-specific information so you extract that >>>> to property files and then pass the correct one to your main configuration >>>> system (XML, Java code, whatever) and it reads the properties. >>>> >>>> Its a solved problem. >>>> >>>> Rakesh >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:20 PM, phil swenson >>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Ok, from my experience I don't see it used. When I suggest it I hear >>>>> it's "bad practice" to mix code and config. Anyway, this is all >>>>> anecdote. Maybe I'm hanging with the wrong people :) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:21 AM, Fabrizio Giudici >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> > On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:13:43 +0100, phil swenson < >>>>> [email protected]> >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> >> I should clarify myself, I really meant "Almost no one in >>>>> >> the java world seems to use dynamic XML for *configuration*" >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > Ah-ha! But I answered before reading this. So I'm almost no one in >>>>> the >>>>> > world. :-) >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > -- >>>>> > Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect @ Tidalwave s.a.s. >>>>> > "We make Java work. Everywhere." >>>>> > http://tidalwave.it/fabrizio/blog - [email protected] >>>>> >>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Java Posse" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
