On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Russel Winder <[email protected]>wrote:

> On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 10:39 -0700, phil swenson wrote:
> > cayla has no checkins for  month, not exactly promising for new web
> > framework
>
> On the other hand it hasn't had checkins for a month which might mean
> there is no churn.
>
> > i looked at kara a month ago or so, looks super early.
>
> Indeed. As does Cayla :-)
>
> > my point was really about having a reasonable mature web framework to
> work
> > with.... plugin architecture ecosystem, testing, build, deployment, etc.
>
> JSF is mature, plugin architecture ecosystem, testing, build,
> deployment, etc. but would you use it?
>

OK, I'll add in "NON-SUCKY" to the conversation.  We were on a side topic
about alternative languages anyway, so I don't see your point.


> >  Play seems way beyond these particular frameworks.   I can deploy play
> to
> > heroku, load of plugins for Play for auth/SaSS/etc.
>
> But it is based on a language that is over 10 years old ;-)
>
> I can deploy Django, Tornado, Flask, Vert.x, Grails, Ratpack, etc. to
> Heroku: Heroku is fairly platform agnostic and is therefore not a factor
> of choice.
>

It does look like Heroku has improved their java story in general.  But
they do have easier paths for some frameworks vs others.  Play is well
understood and supported on Heroku.



>
> > I should clarify, this is just my impression - I haven't done anything
> > serious with Play.
>
> Decision making requires comparative work. Without projects implemented
> in all the frameworks, choice is based on what can only be called
> prejudice. At times this can be fine: if a team knows JSF, Play, Grails,
> and choose to just use it, fine. But if the question is "which is best",
> or "what the comparison between" then data is required, prejudice is no
> longer a valid tool.
>


when you have dozens of choices you can't evaluate all of them.  You go
through a process of elimination.  And right now I don't think many would
even consider Cayla/Kara at all.  Play does make the radar for many more as
it's much more widely adopted/active/supported/documented/mature and
apparently well liked.

All I said was play/akka provide an advantage for Scala over
ceylon/kotlin/other JVM langs.  Do you dispute that?







>
> --
> Russel.
>
> =============================================================================
> Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip:
> sip:[email protected]
> 41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: [email protected]
> London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Java Posse" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Java 
Posse" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to