Hi Andrea, On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 4:41 PM Andrea Giammarchi < andrea.giammar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Small C library means compiling/building and tons of extra problems I'm > actually trying to avoid with this `jsgtk` project so that's not an option. > You could check how Node's os module is implemented internally. In fact I think it is probably done in C as Giovanni suggested :-) [...] > > About `jsgtk`, it sadden me so much GJS had no traction at all, > I wouldn't agree with that. There is plenty of software written in GJS: several major Gnome desktop applications, as well as the desktop itself. being JS24 based > mozjs24 is not an architectural decision. I, for one, would love some help porting GJS to mozjs31 and then mozjs38. > and with a `python_case` syntax nobody in JS world feels OK about, > I am "in the JS world" and I feel OK about it. Really, I don't care about casing, and wish that both variations were supported as they already are with GObject properties, but I wasn't around when that code got written :-) I think jsgtk is a good idea and I'm excited to see what comes out of it but I hope you'll consider helping out to make GJS better as well. Regards, Philip
_______________________________________________ javascript-list mailing list javascript-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/javascript-list
