by "your" I meant `gjs` or even `mozjs24`, hopefully nobody took that
personal. It's not, but linter on languages are annoying: the Syntax parser
is already *the only* needed linter!

Thanks for your understanding, just try to imagine it took long time for me
to patch manually all linter errors in that standalone-babel file.

Best Regards

On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Andrea Giammarchi <
andrea.giammar...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I will try to hack the hell out of everything I can to make that env
> variable available by default ... please release a gjs that doesn't bother
> developers with tool-chain/deployment related tasks like any linter would
> be: it's not your responsibility to tell people how to write **valid
> syntax**
>
> Thank You!!!
>
> On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 8:18 PM, <philip.chime...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 12:08 PM <philip.chime...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Andrea,
>>>
>>> On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 11:31 AM Andrea Giammarchi <
>>> andrea.giammar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Since I've received zero answers on this one, I've assumed there was no
>>>> way to do that.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'm sure there is a way, but I just had no time to investigate this
>>> week. Sorry.
>>>
>>> I believe the "internal linter" is a SpiderMonkey thing, not GJS, so it
>>> would be more a question of whether GJS would accept a patch to disable it.
>>>
>>
>> ...aaaand I found the answer in scarcely more time than it took me to
>> reply to your email :-)
>>
>> GJS_DISABLE_EXTRA_WARNINGS=1 gjs myprogram.js
>>
>> https://git.gnome.org/browse/gjs/tree/gjs/jsapi-util.cpp#n88
>>
>> It is indeed a SpiderMonkey feature that GJS turns on by default. Still,
>> it would be nice to disable it per file or something.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Philip
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
javascript-list mailing list
javascript-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/javascript-list

Reply via email to