On Thu, 2017-11-02 at 22:50 -0300, Andrea Giammarchi wrote:
> FYI the whole project has been moved under a CGJS organization:
> https://github.com/cgjs/cgjs
> 
> If you'd like to contribute please rise your hand and I'll add you.
> 
> So far working:
> require, console, __filename, __dirname, and all timers in place
> next up: process module
> Each core module can be developed a part, using the old jsgtk source
> code to take some example makes it relatively straight forward to
> implement what was there already (hopefully cleaned thanks to modern
> JS syntax).
> 
> Modules are many but not all of them would be essential to make GJS a
> NodeJS developer friendly environment or to share npm modules.
> 
> Here the modules TODO list that is worth prioritizing somehow.
> https://github.com/cgjs/cgjs#commonjs-modules
> 
> I still would like to hear some feedback, thank you!


Not sure what feedback you're looking for here, but I'd say the project
seems really useful, and I hope it succeeds.
Right now writing a desktop app in JS has to either choose node (losing
all the good stuff in the Gtk+ platform) or gjs (loosing all the npm
libraries), which is sad.
With this, most JS only (or browserify-ready) node modules will work.

This said, it looks like you have a long way to go to fill the fill of
core node APIs as cgjs modules.
For some module, it might be worth just copying the node source, once
you have a few base APIs. At least "assert", "events", "stream",
"querystring", "url", "util", maybe even "module", given you have a
working require().
That should give you a lot more support for npm modules out there.

(browserify also has some support for those I believe, and might be a
better source than node, not sure).

The biggest obstacles will be "net", "http" and "fs", which any
nontrivial node module will want to use.

Good luck!

Giovanni

> On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 1:17 PM, Andrea Giammarchi
> <andrea.giammar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I've been thinking about for a while and finally made up my mind:
> > JSGtk+ was solving the wrong issue and in a wrong way. The project
> > is officially death/deprecated now, but not without an alternative
> > ... bear with me ...
> > 
> > npm is the biggest Open Source repository of them all. It's not
> > about NodeJS code, it actually has more Browser modules than Node,
> > but it also has Espruino, Nashorn, MS ChackraCore ... you name it.
> > 
> > Having GJS out of npm is the number one issue I have, while having
> > also a 100% NodeJS compatible API is less relevant.
> > 
> > This is why I've created an alternative to JSGtk+ called CGJS
> > (CommonJS based GJS), which can be installed via npm install -g
> > cgjs and can be used already to require, in a CommonJS fashio,
> > scripts and modules from your project folder.
> > 
> > More details here, and I'd love your contribution / feedback.
> > 
> > Thank You!
> > 
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> javascript-list mailing list
> javascript-list@gnome.org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/javascript-list

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
javascript-list mailing list
javascript-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/javascript-list

Reply via email to