Libusb is designed as a thin wrapper around the usb subsystem of the OS, which
is exactly
why I chose it over javax-usb, and it works great for me. I would hate to see
Libusb get bloated
with a bunch of unnecessary stuff just to support javax-usb running on top of
it.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Islam Beltagy
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 2:57 AM
To: javax-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [javax-usb-devel] Windows implementation and TCK
Hi,
I am working in the Libusb implementation for Windows.
I found that the implementation requires these changes:
1-In Libusb:
Build the correct hierarchy of hubs and devices
Return number of ports of hubs and speed of devices
Support asynchronous control submission
Support short packets
Support the Topology listener
2-In the Java implementation:
Necessary changes after changing Libusb
Get use of already implemented asynchronous IO
Get use of already implemented Isochronous pipe.
I hope I can do these changes soon. If you have any comments or help or
advices, they are really appreciated.
I hope I can pass the TCK.
Thank you for your help
bye
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
javax-usb-devel mailing list
javax-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/javax-usb-devel
