Dan Streetman wrote: > On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Roger Lindsjö <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Dan Streetman wrote: >> I started to run the tests, but ran into some problems. First I had to >> do changes since the tests checks against specific version numbers. This >> is probably wrong, why would the tests check for versions such as 1.0.1? >> However, that was an easy fix. Other than that the tests required no >> other USB devices connected, and that's where I ran into some problems >> as my mouse and keybord are usb devices. >> >> Would it be kosher to rewrite the tests to not be so strict? >> > > I think so. Since this mailing list is basically the committee to > decide if we can make changes, I think as long as we all agree, it > should be fine to change the TCK. > > So you're talking about removing or modifying the tests to check for > specific version numbers right? I am totally fine with that. > The I'll start doing some of those changes. I'll verify what I do with the mailinglist to catch any objections. >> I was also missing an external USB hub required by some of the tests. >> > > Does it need to be a specific usb hub or just any hub? > I'll look again, I don't think it was a specific hub, but since I dind't have one at that point and a lot of other things got in the way I didn't persue any further. >> From the test specification it also seemed that a windows host was >> required which I don't have readily available. >> > > Really? That is bad. Is that just to program the Cypress board? A > windows host shouldn't be required to run the test...we'll need to fix > that. > Just for programmig the cypress. I guess that program could be rewritten in java if needed using javax.usb ;-) I'll have an other go at it. >> Dan, would it be valid to loosen the tests a bit in such a way as >> allowing for different patch version in the implementation and other >> endpoints on the bus? >> > > Yes, I think so. In fact, we could probably use a properties file to > allow setting the specific things to be checked, like what endpoint > number, depending on what hardware the tester is using. Might be a > bit of work to add that in to the TCK though. > I'll start doing what I can (mainly what time permits), but as long as I do something it will probably be easier for the next person.
//Roger Lindsjö ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ javax-usb-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/javax-usb-devel
