Just one word in defense.  I wasn't recommending Malware Byite pro as an anti 
virus program.  I was merely clarifying that it's protection is "real time" 
rather than an after the fact as it is in the free version.  I thought I was 
indicating that it should be run in conjunction with an antivirus program and 
wouldn't be incompatible with that.

As for the accessibility, I can't/won't really comment on that.  It is, to some 
extent, in the eyes of the user.

-----Original Message-----
From: JAWS-Users-List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Steve
Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2015 12:51 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [JAWS-Users] MalwareBytes Pro Myth and Anti-Virus Recommendations

Just a note on the anti-virus discussion.

I think it was yesterday that possibly Cliff recommended using malwarebytes 
Professional as an anti-virus program.  

Two points on this:
First, unless the latest iteration of malwarebytes has improved accessibility, 
I don't like its interface.  They completely broke accessibility in version 
2.0, they did improve it in 2.0.4 but you have to go through hoops to view the 
log of what it proposes to delete.  I don't want it recognizing a program I use 
as a PUP and then deleting or quarantining it.  You have to export the log to 
notepad in order to see it.  Not good last time I used that.

Second, MalwareBytes Pro recognizes a lot of zero-day exploits, but it is not, 
as I understand it, intended as a substitute for an anti-virus program.  Their 
spokesperson stated as such in a Lifehacker article, where he pointed out that 
it wasn't aiming at the traditional anti-virus market.  See


http://lifehacker.com/the-difference-between-antivirus-and-anti-malware-and-1176942277


As for AVG, it really isn't much better than MSSE.  I'll link to an article 
which has a link to the AV Comparatives test of some of the anti-virus 
programs.  

Their top-rated anti-virus programs are Avast! and Bit-Defender.  I haven't 
used Avast in awhile so can't comment on its accessibility, but it had a more 
complex layout.  Their second-ratedd product, Bit Defender, scored nearly as 
highly for basic anti-virus protection but doesn't have all the bells and 
whistles that Avast had.  I haven't evaluated Bit Defender in several years, so 
I don't know if the program is accessible.  I used to get my jollies evaluating 
different AV programs for accessibility, but now that some of them are more 
complicated to uninstall and I don't always have a pair of eyes to go into safe 
mode or click a button with the mouse within thirty seconds...well, you get the 
picture.

Here's the link to the article:
http://lifehacker.com/5865356/the-best-antivirus-app-for-windows 

Take my advice, I don't use it anyway.

Steve
Lansing, MI
For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
http://www.jaws-users.com/help/

For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
http://www.jaws-users.com/help/

Reply via email to