That would be good.Eye transplants, who knows.

On 5/11/15, Holger Fiallo <[email protected]> wrote:
> AI or cloning could replace eyes that are damage or genetic surgery could
> fix the problem with vision.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nicole Valicia Thompson-Andrews
> Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 7:48 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [JAWS-Users] The Future of Jaws
>
> Why wouldn't we need it?
>
> On 5/11/15, Jim Pursley <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I remember, in one of my professional iterations, the book Libraries In
>> The Year q2000 by a professor named Licklider.  This was     1970 and
>> library studies departments at universities  had begun to add
>> "Information Science" to their names.  Come the mid 90's and UC
>> Berkeley's South Hall was no longer the home of the School of
>> Librarianship.  It was the School of Networking and Machine Languages or
>> something of that ilk.  The internet had all but gutted the basic
>> intermediary function of libraries.  Licklider got the networking and
>> information retrieval functions and individualized education functions
>> right but he kept intact the basic structure and function of the library
>> (much as NLS is for us) with a lot of modern bells and whistles.  He did
>> not predict the sweeping changes the internet has brought, followed by
>> wireless communication and now artificial intelligence/machine
>> learning.  I don't think JAWS 100 or anything like it will exist.  I
>> think that physical limitations will largely be overcome by the time
>> another 85 years or so passes. Mechanical sense organs or clones of
>> healthy living ones) will level the getting on with life playing field.
>> Look how much progress has been made since Helen Keller's day.  If you
>> think that like the universe knowledge is expanding at an ever faster
>> rate then my simple ideas will surely be left in the dust.  Yet I hazard
>> that we'll  still be basically the humans we are, if we last another 85
>> years without a war to end all humans.
>>
>> On 5/11/2015 9:26 PM, Holger Fiallo wrote:
>>> Maybe it will not be call jaws 100? To get with the times it need to
>>> have a name that shows that we do more than use it for workowork.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message----- From: Nicole Valicia Thompson-Andrews
>>> Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 7:15 PM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: [JAWS-Users] The Future of Jaws
>>>
>>
>> For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
>> http://www.jaws-users.com/help/
>>
>
>
> --
> Pen Name:
> Mellissa Green
> Twitter
> @abluegreenunivs
>
>
> website
>
> www.abluegreenuniverse.com
>
> For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
> http://www.jaws-users.com/help/
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2015.0.5941 / Virus Database: 4342/9728 - Release Date: 05/08/15
>
>
>
> Holger Fiallo
>
>
> For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
> http://www.jaws-users.com/help/
>


-- 
Pen Name:
Mellissa Green
Twitter
@abluegreenunivs


website

www.abluegreenuniverse.com

For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
http://www.jaws-users.com/help/

Reply via email to