Any thoughts on this...? James
From: "Shawn Bayern" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hi James, > > Hope things have been going well with you! > > I've got a bug to report in Jaxen; let me know if you're not the right > person for it. > > Jaxen seems to compute the context position (i.e., position()) > incorrectly; it instead maps position() to a node's position under its > parent. The easiest way to demonstrate the bug is with a document like > this: > > <root> > <levelOne> > <levelTwo>1-1</levelTwo> > <levelTwo>1-2</levelTwo> > </levelOne> > <levelOne> > <levelTwo>2-1</levelTwo> > <levelTwo>2-2</levelTwo> > <levelTwo>2-3</levelTwo> > <levelTwo>2-4</levelTwo> > </levelOne> > </root> > > and an expression like this: > > //levelTwo[position()=4] > > I believe the correct result is "2-2", but Jaxen 1.0 FCS yields "2-4" (as > the latter is the content of the first <levelTwo> element it finds with a > position of 4 under its parent, rather than the fourth in the set of nodes > selected by the base expression //levelTwo). > > Hope this helps. > > Shawn > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.comm ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Jaxen-interest mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jaxen-interest
