On 5/18/05, Calmbach, Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One thing I notice is that the manual still describes some features as > not supported by JaxMe, whereas the XJCTask javadoc does not have those > warnings (e.g., external schema bindings). Which one is closer to the > truth I don't know and don't have time to explore right now but it > should be well known to the JaxMe developers. Overall, it just seems > like the tables are in need of updating and should probably be synced > with the ones in the XJCTask javadoc. To avoid future synchronization > problems, maybe just one copy of the information should be kept and then > referenced from the other location.
The XJCTask documentation is *much* more uptodate. As for the single source: That would, of course, be very nice. I am eager to wait for suggestions on how to extract DocBook from Java sources. :-) Regards, Jochen -- Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog, its too dark to read. (Groucho Marx) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
