Daniel Barclay wrote: > I think that JaxMeXS might be able to serve both purposes.
Most probably. > One potential solution is to add an additional layer. A better option *might* be to derive the incremental information from the syntax layer, without depending the collected layer on the incremental. Just a thought. At least, it would save a lot of work initially. However: Daniel, I appreciate your thoughts. But I definitely won't do these things. This is a matter of time. If you are interested to do this: Welcome to the show. Otherwise it is quite unlikely that anyone will do this. Jochen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
