On 5/20/05, Nacho G. Mac Dowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have made Richard's changes in xjctask.xml. However, I am hesitating > to check in because I am not sure if you are in the process of building. > Should I just commit it to HEAD?
0.4 is out, so feel free to commit in 0.4 as well. (Documentation changes aren't so much of a problem, btw.) Thanks for doing this! > PD: I think the best way to avoid this is to actually point to the > javadoc for XJCTask which contains the up-to-date documentation. Basically agreed. But then, that wouldn't meet the purpose of a manual, wouldn't it? Jochen -- Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog, its too dark to read. (Groucho Marx) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
