On Sun, 2005-08-21 at 12:41 +0200, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > robert burrell donkin wrote: > > > i'm still a little unsure about the plan. AIUI we have a mavenised build > > on the MAVEN branch which has the changes made to trunk ported into it. > > so it's currently the same as trunk but uses maven. is this right? > > Exactly. > > > what's stopping copying MAVEN into trunk ATM? > > I see no problem in using the MAVEN branch for some days, until it is > ready for Gump. I remember that we broke the Gump builds of about > hundred projects, because one important project (don't remember exactly > which, maybe dom4j or something similar) depends on us and a real lot of > projects depended on that. We should really try to avoid the situation.
ok > To me, the important part is that we are able to work on a common > branch, because that minimizes the work, which is spent for merging. As > Nacho has reached so far, we are able to do that now. cool > > is the plan to alter the gump meta-data so that it uses the MAVEN branch > > first and then change it to use trunk later? > > I'd suggest to create a new meta data descriptor in Gump, which uses the > MAVEN branch. No other projects depend on it, so one can work on it > without ruffle. As soon as the new meta data descriptor builds > successfully, we can replace the old meta data descriptor with the new > one and make the MAVEN branch the trunk. that sounds like a good plan > > i should have said: it'll be a few days once i have the mavenised build > > running reliably on my machine :-/ > > No problems here. As for the "running reliably": My impression is, that > Nacho uses another Maven version than we do (1.0.2). I've had a hard > time yesterday to get it all working, but it seems to be working fine > now for me. i use 1.0.2 but when i run "maven multiproject:install" i get: "The build cannot continue because of the following unsatisfied dependency: jaxmexs-0.6-dev.jar (try downloading from http://ws.apache.org/jaxme/xs/)" maven:multiproject fails in a similar fashion. is it necessary to build each project separately? - robert
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
