I have as many problems with T24 design as everyone else but the
'ugly' structure ensures performance in exceptionally high transaction
volume sites.

The key is designed to give a good distribution for transactions
whilst ensuring commonality (each component is a transaction
characteristic) and minimal locking; the use of these consolidated
entries reduces the COB time by ensuring fewer records have to be
processed.

The unconsolidated version of the ID is simply day / port / time /
sequence so is equally meaningless for investigation purposes.

John.

On Apr 24, 4:26 pm, Vlad <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm wondering who invented those netted postings. Probably it was
> really a bad day for those who decided to make such an ugly structure
> of the ID. Instead of standard "150810001139384.00" style, now
> RE.CONSOL.SPEC.ENTRY file has this "R!LD.1.TR.BHD.21071.1002.BH.5Y....
> 1200.3..17.LIVEDB.20100308!DR!BHD!LD!CNW!20090308!!!1!!!20090308!17!
> 21071". Obviously, Temenos has to hire some good architects.
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Please read the posting guidelines at: 
http://groups.google.com/group/jBASE/web/Posting%20Guidelines

IMPORTANT: Type T24: at the start of the subject line for questions specific to 
Globus/T24

To post, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jBASE?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to