I dont think your claim about CFQ not being able to handle the extended
dates is correct. To the extent i have been working with T24, the CFQ API
has been modified to handle the extended dates under the newly introduced
process for recurrence pattern.

Hope this helps.

Harish

On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:32 PM, master <[email protected]> wrote:

> T24 Version: R09
> Application: STANDING.ORDER
>
> Little background - many frequency fields in T24 are in the format
> YYYYMMDDXXXXX where XXXXX is the frequency, e.g. 20100101M0101.
>
> Using the subroutine CFQ gives the next date from a frequency string.
>
> My question regards the new frequency format in T24:
>
> Currently the frequency will be in the format: YYYYMMDD eXY eXM eXW
> eXD e0F or something like that. e.g.
> 20090209 e0Y e1M e0W o9D e0F
>
> Anyone knows how to calculate the next date from this? I tried
> converting the above format to the old YYYYMMDDXXXXX format but the
> old format does not support all the features of the new format. For
> instance, in the new format, a user can specify '20100101 e0Y e0M e1W
> o3D e0F' meaning '01 JAN 2010 Weekly on Wed'. Im having a hard time
> translating that to a format usable by CFQ. In fact, I think CFQ
> cannot handle this new format.
>
> I'm sure someone somewhere has done this before :)
>
> Thanx in advance
>
> --
> Please read the posting guidelines at:
> http://groups.google.com/group/jBASE/web/Posting%20Guidelines
>
> IMPORTANT: Type T24: at the start of the subject line for questions
> specific to Globus/T24
>
> To post, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/jBASE?hl=en
>

-- 
Please read the posting guidelines at: 
http://groups.google.com/group/jBASE/web/Posting%20Guidelines

IMPORTANT: Type T24: at the start of the subject line for questions specific to 
Globus/T24

To post, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jBASE?hl=en

Reply via email to