See the archive. Basically I don't think you should be replicating the
system like this.

Jim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of David McGehee
> Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 2:51 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Trying to avoid trigger recursion in a jBASE system
> 
> No I did not see your reply.  You are advising me not to do what?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of Jim Idle
> Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 4:16 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Trying to avoid trigger recursion in a jBASE system
> 
> Did you not see my reply advising you not to do this?
> 
> Jim
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf
> > Of David McGehee
> > Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 9:58 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: RE: Trying to avoid trigger recursion in a jBASE system
> >
> > I posted this last week but I never say it on line so either it was
> blocked or ??
> >
> > We use triggers to keep our co-location in sync on a hot basis.  We
> have a
> > somewhat more Complex situation in that ALL of our jbase files are
> kept in
> > sync this way.  To manage this, And in order to preclude recursion,
> our
> > common trigger creates a key describing the file, record Key, and
> operation
> > (write, clear, delete) and writes the record with that key into a
> common
> file
> > at The incurring site.  A separate process is WAKED and writes the
> available
> > records to the corresponding File at the other site.  There a process
> which
> > was started at port 4999 writes the transported record(s) to the
> target
> File.
> > The trigger code is written such that it checks the process port and
> if >
> 4500,
> > ignores the trigger trip and exits.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf
> > Of LWhite
> > Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 10:50 AM
> > To: jBASE
> > Subject: Re: Trying to avoid trigger recursion in a jBASE system
> >
> > If a second post shows up I apologize. I had a mishap with the tab
> key. :)
> >
> > OK, Thanks for the replies. I am going to be looking up a lot of what
> you
> > mentioned.
> >
> > Maybe if I try to explain the situation again you might see something
> that
> I
> > didn't properly express the first time.
> >
> > I have a system with a file named IM (item master)
> >
> > There are both basic and PROC programs accessing it.
> >
> > Management has decided that we need to be able to have one company
> > write code and distribute it to all of the other entities.
> >
> > We have done this before by using an include file that each entity
> adjusted
> > to fit their individual file names and order of attributes.
> > Example being that we all store an English part name in the IM but not
> in
> the
> > same attribute.
> >
> > Operations has decided that we will have all companies move to the
> same
> > file structure. So every company will now have a MPF (manufacturing
> > product file) and that it will have the part name in attribute 2. For
> some
> > reason they will not continue using the include file. I cannot explain
> why. I
> > have not had it explained to me.
> >
> > Global code is being worked on. We must use it and we must have the
> file
> > structure set up by a specific date.
> >
> > However, They do not want us to touch every program that currently
> > accesses the files that have a global equivalent. Since they will be
> moving to
> > one process they want time to evaluate each portion. We still have to
> deploy
> > part of it now.
> >
> > Our idea was to create triggers on the files to keep the local and
> global
> files in
> > sync. Triggers are not required by anything. Any idea that someone
> believes
> > is better will be looked at.
> >
> > I am just a code monkey. I am doing what I have been told to do and we
> are
> > not given an option on the implementation of the code or the
> structure.
> >
> > I am going to go look up transaction journaling and activeMQ.
> > Thanks.
> >
> > --
> > Please read the posting guidelines at:
> > http://groups.google.com/group/jBASE/web/Posting%20Guidelines
> >
> > IMPORTANT: Type T24: at the start of the subject line for questions
> specific
> > to Globus/T24
> >
> > To post, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send
> email
> > to [email protected]
> > For more options, visit this group at
> > http://groups.google.com/group/jBASE?hl=en
> >
> > --
> > Please read the posting guidelines at:
> > http://groups.google.com/group/jBASE/web/Posting%20Guidelines
> >
> > IMPORTANT: Type T24: at the start of the subject line for questions
> specific
> > to Globus/T24
> >
> > To post, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send
> email
> > to [email protected]
> > For more options, visit this group at
> > http://groups.google.com/group/jBASE?hl=en
> 
> --
> Please read the posting guidelines at:
> http://groups.google.com/group/jBASE/web/Posting%20Guidelines
> 
> IMPORTANT: Type T24: at the start of the subject line for questions
specific
> to Globus/T24
> 
> To post, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send email
> to [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/jBASE?hl=en
> 
> --
> Please read the posting guidelines at:
> http://groups.google.com/group/jBASE/web/Posting%20Guidelines
> 
> IMPORTANT: Type T24: at the start of the subject line for questions
specific
> to Globus/T24
> 
> To post, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send email
> to [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/jBASE?hl=en

-- 
Please read the posting guidelines at: 
http://groups.google.com/group/jBASE/web/Posting%20Guidelines

IMPORTANT: Type T24: at the start of the subject line for questions specific to 
Globus/T24

To post, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jBASE?hl=en

Reply via email to