> Hmm, yes, it sounds like there is still a memory leak. I'll take another

I suspect it's a JDK6 bug since I've came across some similar issues
googling the internet. I then tried to see if I can reproduce it in
JDK5 but I always got a "bad version in class" error, so I assumed
that some of our jars must have been compiled under JDK6. Please keep
me posted if you have some discovery.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"JBookTrader" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jbooktrader?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to