No problem.  Tell me how it works out for you.

On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 3:12 AM, MKoistinen <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> I was at first concerned about using such 'heavy' structures as a
> LinkedList, but as the size of the window gets larger, this is far
> superior -- thanks, Shaggs.
>
> On Aug 5, 2:59 am, ShaggsTheStud <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Now you are starting to talk about what I write every day for work.
> >
> > First thing that comes to mind for a sliding window is to use a linked
> > list.   Add to the end, remove from the begging.
> >
> > For running sums, you do something like this (very rough pseudocode):
> >
> > LinkedList Xs;
> > LinkedLIst Ys;
> >
> > void calculate(newX, newY)
> > {
> >      Xs.addLast(newX);
> >      Ys.addLast(newY);
> >
> >      oldX = Xs.getFirst();
> >      oldY = Ys.getFirst();
> >      Xs.removeFirst();
> >      Ys.removeFirst();
> >
> >      Xsum -= oldX;
> >      Ysum -= oldY;
> >      XXsum -= oldX * oldX;
> >      XYsum -= oldX * oldY;
> >
> >      Xsum += newX;
> >      Ysum += newY;
> >      XXsum += newX * newX;
> >      XYsum += newX * newY;
> >
> > }
> >
> > Now you don't waste so much time summing squares, etc.
> >
> > Another bit of advice: for large amounts of accumulation, integer values
> may
> > be more predictable, as they don't accumulate weird bits of noise from
> > floating point errors.  I have not verified this actually happens in the
> > real world.
> >
> > And another option is to store less data and create "weighted average
> bars",
> > covering longer amounts of time.
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 8:22 AM, nonlinear5 <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > I have a new indicator, called DepthPriceCorrelation. It's not in the
> > > release yet, but it's in SVN
> >
> > >http://code.google.com/p/jbooktrader/source/browse/trunk/source/com/j.
> ..
> >
> > > The indicator is based on the idea that current price can be
> > > considered "fair" when the correlation between market depth balances
> > > and market prices is positive. This positive correlation occurs when:
> >
> > > -- high depth balances are accompanied by higher prices
> > > or
> > > -- low depth balances are accompanied by lower prices
> >
> > > When the correlation is negative, the prices are moving in the
> > > direction opposite from the direction of depth balances, and I call it
> > > a "high tension" condition. This is when my strategy gets into a
> > > position on the bet that the tension will ease and the correlation
> > > will return to its "normal" positive value. Here is an example of such
> > > a strategy:
> >
> > >http://code.google.com/p/jbooktrader/source/browse/trunk/source/com/j.
> ..
> >
> > > Now, to calculate the correlation, the indicator simply updates the
> > > running sums for prices and balances, and then uses a standard
> > > correlation coefficient formula to come up with the result. This is
> > > very efficient, and it works well. The problem is, sometime in the
> > > second half of the trading session, the indicator becomes too "stale",
> > > because it uses all the data accumulated so far during the trading
> > > session. So, at say, 2pm, the indicator would represent the
> > > correlation between balances and prices based on all the data from
> > > 9:30am to 2pm, while my strategy is looking for a shorter term
> > > correlation, such as the last 2 hours. It's certainly possible to
> > > recalculate the indicator based on this 2-hour moving window, but it
> > > would be very computationally expensive, since every time, I would
> > > need to loop through the last two hours of values, instead of simply
> > > updating the running sums.
> >
> > > So, here is the question for the algorithmically inclined. How do I
> > > *efficiently* calculate the correlation between X and Y in a moving
> > > time window?
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"JBookTrader" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jbooktrader?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to