> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Juha Lindfors
> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2000 2:28 PM
> To: jBoss Developer
> Subject: RE: [jBoss-Dev] EJX GUI: jboss.xml AND ejb-jar.xml?
>
>
>
> Hey,
>
> just a minor point but...
>
> At 16:16 24.5.2000 -0400, you wrote:
> >The problem is that a scripting solution requires a user or
> >administrator of our J2EE server to write scripts. This is only user-
> >friendly to people who cut their teeth on *nix.
>
> This is user friendly to a power user. It's not tied to *nix
> world. Windows
> has its fair share of scripting as well.
>
> So what is the profile of the average user using our J2EE(?) tool?
Let's not fight over this... I think Juha was very close when he said that
MVC pattern (even though I don't think he identified the pattern correctly
;-). If we have a solid separation of the M part we can talk to it through
many channels:
1- Static stuff with the file, like today (not talking about the generation
through the GUI)
2- dynamic with the GUI, if you must insist, so that we would couple the GUI
to the objects in the container (have the GUI be a shell to the container),
right now the GUI holds its own objects and the container ones are rebuild
from step 1
3- have the shell talk directly to the container and the objects (ejx.ejb)
it holds... yeah gimme raw power and visibility:)
yeah yeah, welcome to the future.
marc
>
>
> -- Juha
>
>
>
>
